Registration Panel
The assessment of applicants’ portfolios is a key part of the regulatory process. The Registration Panel is accountable to the UKPHR Board and is composed of assessors; it is chaired by a UKPHR Board member. The Chair of the Panel will not be a member of any assessment team.
The Registration Panel meets regularly to review the recommendations of assessors and then makes recommendations to the Board for final decision on admission to the Register. The Registration Panel receives advice from its moderators whose aim is to help ensure consistent and robust judgements during the assessment process. Progress reports from the moderators are presented regularly to the UKPHR Board.
Assessment for Public Health Specialists
Assessors for the public health specialists routes are appointed from a variety of backgrounds: medical, non-medical and independent. All assessors require appropriate experience in assessment and must have worked in their field at a senior level in a service, managerial or academic areas. Some assessors are members or fellows of the Faculty of Public Health and have experience of examining candidates for the Faculty of Public Health part B exam.
Assessment for Public Health Practitioners
With practitioner registration the assessment process is devolved to within the practitioners’ region. After completion of assessment the application is referred to a regional verification panel that will then make recommendations on eligibility for practitioner registration direct to the UKPHR Registration Panel. In this case the UKPHR Registration Panel’s role will be ensuring that standards are consistent across the devolved schemes and across the UK as a whole. Within its remit the UKPHR Registration Panel has the right to quality assure any part of the process.
Appeals
The UKPHR has an established appeal process through which an applicant may appeal against a decision to refuse them registration following assessment. The grounds on which consideration is given to an applicant’s request for an appeal are as follow:
1. That a material error or defect occurred in the administrative procedures followed by the UKPHR Board and/or its assessors or the Registration Panel which affected the outcome of the assessment, or any part of it.
2. That an assessor or an assessment team did not perform their duty in accordance with the requirements and other advice issued by the UKPHR Board to such an extent that it may have materially affected the outcome of the assessment or any part of it.
The UKPHR Board will maintain its obligation to demonstrate to the public that the published standards of competence are being maintained. The onus will be on the specialist to establish that the decision should be reviewed. No new material relating to the application can be submitted for an appeal hearing.
Current UKPHR assessors:
George Morris, Chair of the Registration Panel
Sue Lloyd, Vice Chair of the Registration Panel
Jenny Griffiths, Moderator
Cerilan Rogers, Moderator
Andy Beckingham
Barbara Brady
Steve Brown
Sandra Cairney
Kevin Elliston
Rachel Flowers
Elaine Garman
Linda Hillman
Vicky Hobart
Ann Hoskins
Jackie Landman
John Lucy
Elaine Lynch-Farmery
Katrina McCormick
Amy Nicholas
Asa'ah Nkohkwo
Maggie Rae
Krishna Ramkhelawon
Mike Robinson
Jane Royle
Angela Snowling
Lillian Somervaille
Viv Speller
Vicki Taylor
Gary Telfer
Jane Thomas
Christopher Watts
Albert Yeung